31 Comments
Sep 7·edited Sep 7Liked by Deconstructing 4IR Narratives

Perhaps needless to say, the Orwellian slogan at the heart of all this is “Ignorance is Strength”.

"Disturbingly, it seems FSANZ is more interested in assisting industry” — Of course the parallels between Big Ag and Big Pharma are not accidental. Same M.O.: the merging of state and corporate interests, and doing away with both informed choice and consent. Also, this blurring of lines between natural and synthetic mirrors the transhumanist push.

“Reject all proposed changes to the Food Standard as all would deregulate gene-edited foods and deny us any labelling.” — YES!

Gene Ethics Australia: “This completely ignores the substantial body of hard scientific evidence that UPFs, loaded with salt, fat, sugar, and synthetic factory-made ingredients, cause ill health and death.”— Considering that causing “ill health and death” is one of the principal unspoken goals, that statement would be more accurate if “completely ignores” were replaced with “takes into account”.

Expand full comment

absa fuck ing lute ly

Expand full comment

Problem is who out there gives a hoot! We are in the hands of maniacs who have lost their humanity and the sooner we are all dead or merged with the machines the better according to the plan. Energy costs are going through the roof and we keep breeding. What is the answer ? Depopulation is the only solution and a tight reign on every phase of being.

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by Deconstructing 4IR Narratives

As per usual smashing it out the park Kate! THANK YOU so much for giving a "f~ck", doing the research and sharing it with your audience! You make the world a better place... 🙏❤️

Expand full comment
author

That's so lovely. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by Deconstructing 4IR Narratives

Thank you Kate for all your research that you are providing here. I'm sharing your substack on as many platforms as I can. 🙏

Expand full comment
author

Thank you!!

Expand full comment
Sep 8·edited Sep 8Liked by Deconstructing 4IR Narratives

We are constantly warned about the threat of mis and disinformation but the real threat is in the subjects about which we hear NOTHING AT ALL. Where has the discussion of this been in our media? Those who are disgusted when anyone raises doubts about climate change or leftist governments meddling in so many areas of our lives, have no notion of this. By far, this is the real threat to humanity; all the manipulation, lies and deceptions run by our governments, compliant agencies and media.

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by Deconstructing 4IR Narratives

What could possibly go wrong🤦‍♀️🤯

Expand full comment
Sep 16Liked by Deconstructing 4IR Narratives

Truth in advertising and product labelling - 2 deficiencies in governance that enable corruption.

Expand full comment

should any one who proposes the hiding of truth... should be declared an " outlaw " ? ie outside the protection of law ... and may be dealth with in any manner by anybody ... good God help us all return/turn to goodness, truth

Expand full comment

new medi sin es no longer need safety testing for the vaxxed genetically modyfied people ... because ... they dont have human rights ... because they are no longer considered humans because... they are no longer made exclusivally by God made in Gods image and likeness ,,, but are genetically modyfied [ changed ] with mrna vaxxes .... please good God help the demon possesed pshycopathic world leaders and their knowing and not knowing supporters return to goodness and truth ...https://thereisnopandemic.net/2022/02/26/legal-impact-of-mrna-vaccines-chile-enacts-anti-discrimination-against-mutants-law-24-february-2022/Legalized FDA non-regulation of biological products effective May 2, 2019, by Federal Register Final Rule, signed by then-FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb.

Expand full comment

They are already doing this with meat. I think the company is/was called beyond meat. They were co- located with abortion clinic nice 👍 n Germany and the US. They were using aborted foetal products that n the process. Pepsi also used aborted foetal tissue to enhance flavour. The abortion is industry in the US is that coved to n the way harms / food biochemical industries, it’s about the money not women’s rights. There was a recent podcast where n FLCCC with Dr Meryl Nass discussing n this subject around GMO food - very interesting. They have been altering legislation around food production for at least 40 years.

Expand full comment
author

The aborted baby tissue information is so disturbing. The beyond meat is "plant based"- it's heavily synthetic and GMO, but it's not from cell lines of animals- which the lab meat is. They are only just now in the process globally of allowing lab meat onto the market.

Expand full comment

I believe beyond meat went under. I originally saw post on that around 3 years ago. Apparently aborted baby parts have a price list depending on which body part. With the corruption in the Capitol and industries funding to parties under lobbyists it’s horrific. Even these vaccines contain aborted foetal tissue.

Expand full comment

I discovered that their parameters are for their own benefit and circular argument. However i did remind them of their duty of care, their job descriptions we pay them etc...I note they want to use their same 'pre GM modified 'line' approval' also for animals in the future p25 - doubtless we'll be next, after all we have the same 'characteristics and consistency' of 'Dolly the Sheep' so we must all be sheep, right?!

Expand full comment

So is NBT the same as Crispr? Middle of a submission which will be as a consumer .. emphasis will be on requesting increase transparency and labelling .. as well as regulator accountability for decisions made if there are future negative consequences. Oh by the way I want to see not just GMO labelling but gene editing & whether Glycoshate free 😉

Expand full comment
author

Yes, Crispr is one of the technologies used.

Expand full comment

On side note I’ve asking questions on perplexity Ai

My last question was What are benefits of regenerative agriculture versus what they are planning in Australia to down regulate GMO/NBT .. particularly in relation to environmental and climate impacts

Response

Regenerative agriculture and the potential down-regulation of GMOs and Novel Breeding Techniques (NBTs) in Australia present contrasting approaches to addressing environmental and climate impacts. Here’s a comparison of the benefits of regenerative agriculture versus the implications of down-regulating GMOs/NBTs:

### Benefits of Regenerative Agriculture

1. **Soil Health Improvement**: Regenerative agriculture focuses on enhancing soil health through practices that increase organic matter and biodiversity, leading to improved water retention and nutrient cycling[1][3].

2. **Carbon Sequestration**: This approach actively captures carbon in soils, helping mitigate climate change by reducing atmospheric CO2 levels. It can significantly contribute to carbon drawdown, which is crucial in combating climate change[2][4].

3. **Biodiversity Enhancement**: Regenerative practices promote biodiversity by restoring ecosystems and improving habitat for various species, which is essential for resilient agricultural systems[3][5].

4. **Resilience to Climate Change**: By improving soil structure and health, regenerative agriculture enhances resilience against extreme weather events, such as droughts and floods, which are becoming more frequent due to climate change[1][4].

5. **Economic Viability**: Farmers practicing regenerative agriculture often report higher profitability and better overall well-being compared to conventional methods, as they reduce reliance on chemical inputs and improve ecosystem services[3][4].

### Implications of Down-Regulating GMOs/NBTs

1. **Limited Technological Advancement**: Down-regulating GMOs and NBTs may hinder the adoption of innovative agricultural technologies that could improve crop resilience and yields, particularly in the face of climate challenges[1].

2. **Potential for Increased Emissions**: Without the benefits of genetically modified crops that can withstand harsh conditions or reduce pesticide use, reliance on conventional farming may lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture[1].

3. **Food Security Concerns**: Reducing the use of GMOs/NBTs could impact food production efficiency, making it more challenging to meet the growing food demands of a changing climate, especially in regions prone to drought or other extreme weather[1][2].

4. **Economic Impact**: Farmers may face higher production costs and reduced competitiveness in global markets if they cannot utilize advanced biotechnologies that enhance crop performance and sustainability[1][4].

### Conclusion

While regenerative agriculture offers significant environmental and economic benefits, down-regulating GMOs and NBTs may limit the agricultural sector's ability to adapt to climate change and ensure food security. A balanced approach that incorporates both regenerative practices and the responsible use of biotechnology could provide a more comprehensive solution to the challenges facing Australian agriculture.

Sources

[1] The role of regenerative agriculture in sustainable land use https://www.climateworkscentre.org/resource/the-role-of-regenerative-agriculture-role-in-sustainable-land-use/

[2] Regenerative Agriculture https://www.landcarewa.org.au/resources/hot-topics/regenerative-agriculture/

[3] Regenerative Agriculture Techniques and Benefits for woolgrowers https://www.wool.com/on-farm-research/regenerative-techniques-and-benefits/

[4] What is regenerative agriculture, and why does it matter? https://greens.org.au/magazine/what-regenerative-agriculture-and-why-does-it-matter

[5] Regenerative Agriculture - Local Land Services https://www.lls.nsw.gov.au/regions/hunter/projects-and-programs/regenerative-agriculture

[6] An introduction to regenerative agriculture - Open Food Network Australia https://about.openfoodnetwork.org.au/project/an-introduction-to-regenerative-agriculture/

[7] Regenerative Agriculture: An opportunity for businesses and society to restore degraded land in Africa https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/2022-06/regnererative_agriculture_in_africa_report_2021_compressed.pdf

[8] Regenerative agriculture: what it is and why it matters | Unilever https://www.unileverusa.com/news/2023/regenerative-agriculture-what-it-is-and-why-it-matters/

Expand full comment

HOW CAN WE TRUST THE "WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION" when they seem to have overlooked such a powerful essential nutrient with so many benefits? They never looked after us since day 1 and the world needs to know this

https://jefftbowles.com/vitamin-d3-deficiency-causes-most-human-disease/ Part 5 is based on this.

https://freespeechisfreedom.substack.com/p/the-who-and-the-suppression-of-basics Part 1

1 cancer ( breast) , Australian death data over 30 years extrapolated worldwide over 30 years., did 15 million people die earlier than need be? . Breast cancer incidence is down 83% at 60 ng/ml or 150 nmol/l How do you go and tell all the caring, compassionate people who wear pink and raise money how a simple nutrient could have saved so many and our system did not use it. Seems logical that death rate and incidence are directly proportional.

https://freespeechisfreedom.substack.com/p/vitamin-d-part-2-the-who-and-the

2 cancers ( breast and colon cancer) and heart disease over 30 years, did 99-124 million people die earlier than need be?

https://freespeechisfreedom.substack.com/p/vitamin-d-part-3-the-who-and-the

At this level of vitamin D, over 30 years did 237 million people die earlier than need be? 59 million x 30 years x 16%

https://freespeechisfreedom.substack.com/p/vitamin-d-part-4-the-who-and-the

The use and suppression of Vitamin D pre-WW2, given the effects in the first 3 parts, if it had been used properly since WW2, would maybe > 500 million not need to die earlier than need be?

https://freespeechisfreedom.substack.com/p/vitamin-d-part-5-the-who-and-the If all we had to do was raise of Vitamin D levels to at least the natural levels of those at the equator/tropics how much longer would lifespans be? Over 15+ major diseases shown, how can this be ignored by the health system? These graphs are hard data. Newsletter & data sources shown. We really have massive problems? https://jefftbowles.com/vitamin-d3-deficiency-causes-most-human-disease/. How many people died earlier than need be? This is one basic and do we have a whole health industry not very aware of this data.

https://qr.page/g/2sBt7xALSS9 Hidden history or suppressed, did this put public and world health almost back a century? Last 12 pages of Jeff Bowles book with his references.

If people knew this it might change the whole debate quickly.

Expand full comment

Hi ... it Does seem that Australia and New Zealand have nothing but psycho Gollums controlling just about everything!!

They are not satisfied with the destruction of their victims lives it seems that they must poison the food and the environment and the people and as many creatures as they can ..!

They apparently are building mRNA factories all over the planet.

It is Orwellian but also the genetic engineering they talk about ... the son of a nazi seems to be the frontman of the wef... and a character straight out of the James Bond movies... staring you will own nothing and be happy and very much more disturbing (yes it is possible)...it doesnt change what you do it changes you !!

I’m thinking of A brave new world written by Aldous Huxley . That story describes a “civilisation” structured socially and economically using genetically engineered “people “ in a very strict hierarchy. But the inequalities abundantly represented are not a concern of the societies inmates because the inmates consciousness is genetically designed .,

And if you listen you can hear the words of yuval Harare saying “ free will ... it’s over”!!!

So fiction. and science fiction can guide us through the nightmarish reality these wef and other acronym cronies are intending to impose upon us all ...

I myself have no desire to inhabit the genetic Borg Legoland they are attempting to create for us all.

You are what you eat !!!?!

Bugs for lunch!!

Expand full comment

At the very least require labelling.

Expand full comment